The
B100 world is a world of half assed sequels. Hell, it's not even
that. It's a world of half assed sequels to movies that were half
assed to begin with. Troll 2 is a prime example, and that wasn't even
really a sequel, since it had literally
nothing to do with Trolls. This part of the
movie spectrum is ripe with shitty attempts to cash in on a previous
movie's minor success, often with a completely different set of
actors and crew, and a total disregard for artistic integrity. For
tonight's failure feature,
at least, the star came back for seconds. I don't think he understood
what that meant. If you haven't already guessed it, we're taking a
look at…
A troubled John looks on helplessly, as this movie heads for the hills, screaming. |
This
one obviously follows the mildly popular Nine ½ Weeks starring the
ever lovely, albeit body doubled, Kim Basinger along with Mickey
Rourke, who, by all means, was a good looking guy back in the days.
He's not anymore. He looks cool, kind of. But not really the same
silky smooth pretty boy features he had, before he got the
weird idea, that boxing followed by reconstructive surgery upon
reconstructive surgery was a good way to advance
his career. He's still a very decent actor, in my opinion, so I
suppose I'll digress and concede that he still has that going for
him. And I'm by no means averse to his roles in movies like Sin City,
where he does a helluva job as Marv. But looking back on a movie like
Nine ½ Weeks, you just can't help but think: what if he hadn't gone
the boxing and surgery way? In any case, it doesn't matter now. We're
here to discuss the second installment in the 9½ week duology, made
an astounding 11 years hence. Mickey Rourke made quite a few wonky
movies in the late 80s and through the nineties, and this one is
definitely one of the ones where you can't help but think it was done
solely for money. While the first Nine ½ Weeks was a passable
movie at best, at least it had a certain quality or ambience to it,
that gave it what little charm it did have. And it had Kim Basinger.
I haven't watched it in only too many years, and I suspect it will
likely remain so, but I remember it was kinds of boring, and
pretentiously artsy in a overplayed way. High society New York Art
Gallery aficionados who, obviously, enjoy some mild bondage, because
that's not cliché at all. No siree. In the second one, the fancy
smancy New York settings are substituted by equally fancy smancy
Paris settings. Cliché much? Not at all.
British balding gay dude with small sunglasses and a cigarette held casually? Innovative! |
The
description for the movie claims "John
flies over to Paris to find out (sic)
his girlfriend Elizabeth". Like I
said, I don't honestly remember Nine ½ Weeks to the letter, but going by what little I managed to store in my memory bank, Elizabeth broke up with John by the end
of the movie, because he was just a little too obsessive, and she
totally didn't go for all his suppressed anger bullshit. Anyway,
perhaps John has convinced himself, that they are actually still a
couple. It doesn't really even matter, because as he arrives in
Paris, through sheer dumb luck (or some other reason I might've
overlooked) he
runs into Claire, a fashion designer whom he immediately wants to
bone feels attracted to. Turns out she even knew Elizabeth, so it's a twofer, for old
John Gray. Hmm wait a cotton picking minute here. Gray. Light
bondage. Fashionable pseudo-sophisticated settings? Emotionally
distant, want to be in control, rich male character? Where have I
heard of this before? Oh right, it's pretty much the story of 50
Shades of Grey, the infamous erotic Twillight fan-fic that everybody
loves to hate, but many a housewife is
secretly reading anyway, to compensate
an empty marriage. Yeah OK,
glad I got that cleared up. Let's proceed. Christian Grey John Gray
gets himself mixed up in all kinds of depraved sordid affairs in
Paris, the likes of which would've made Tom Cruise's character in
Eyes Wide Shut blush and run home to mommy. Alright that's a lie.
Very little actually happens in this movie, and John Gray is only
mildly harassed by some street thugs, just as he kicks the ass of
some other dude who is harassing his new lady friend's assistant. He also kind of getting funky with her, but then not really anyway. I seem to remember a threesome
later on, between John and Claire and assistant chick, so I'm sure he's been sweet talking that little lady too.
John kind of maintains throughout the movie, that he's actually still
looking for Elizabeth (who
obviously doesn't want to be found) and
also buying art for... a gallery or personal consumption? It's not
clear. I don't know what he's really
doing to find her, but it's not much, because surely finding an
American lady in the fashion world in Paris should be doable. Right?
She's a gallery owner and connoisseur, so
she'll be high society, seen and known by many. I
don't know. Perhaps I'm just old fashioned.
The mandatory sex-on-the-street-because-that-totally-means-intense-passion scene. |
This
movie is directed by a woman, which kind of surprised me, because I
have this weird idea, that women directors in and around Hollywood
have more integrity than the men, because it's harder to get taken
seriously as a woman behind the camera than as a man. But I suppose I'm
just falling prey to classical gender stereotypes. Hey, I never
claimed to be perfect. Not out loud anyway. So it's a woman making
this shit, and she did just as bang up of a job, as if it had been a
dude, I suspect. The movie is predictably boring and lame. Not
predictably lame because of a woman director, but because there was
no way to make this script interesting. I
do seem to remember, that the story
was relatively consistent throughout, which is something of a rarity
with these movies. Meaning the script and direction at least had the
movie making sense chronologically. It's so easy to fall prey to the
old 'let's just put stuff that looks cool in randomly' routine that
we see all the time here. Perhaps her female intuition kept her out of that particular trap. Sadly for Another 9½ Weeks, it didn't save
the movie from feeling uninspired and boring. The characters feel
numb like they are constantly walking around in a daze of some sort.
There are plenty of scenes shot in kind of dream
like sequences,
and it doesn't appear to serve any other purpose, than to emphasize
what kind of weird limbo state John Gray is in. It works on a weird
level, I suppose, but we just don't give a shit about his quest to
find Elizabeth, because it seems like he
doesn't either. Like he's just in Paris and
if she turns up fine. If not, oh well who cares, he
still gets to doink ladies and smoke cigarettes and drink wine.
The mandatory we-in-the-paris-art-scene-totally-go-to-fetish-parties-because-its-hip scene. |
Rourke totally phones his performance
in, and you can almost hear his hopes and dreams diminish for every line delivered. The rest
of the cast is completely forgettable. Including
the female lead character, Agatha de la Fontaine, despite
her attempts to stand out. She had, what I
can only assume was, a pair of silicon infused breasts, and she
looked kind of like Jesse Venture Cindy Crawford. I later found out that she got
married to some French footballer (as in soccer) called Emanuel
Petit. Not that this has any relevance, but there we are. I didn't
ask you for an opinion. She kind of struck me as a porn star trying
to cut into the mainstream market by taking small roles in low budget
shitty productions like this. I suppose she isn't, or wasn't ever, a
pornstar, and I'd apologize to her for insinuating that she was, if I
ever got the chance. Thankfully I won't get
that chance, because the apology would probably be insincere.
That's a flock of seagulls just waiting to land! |
The
director chick is called Anne Goursaud and seems to mostly be known
for editing quite a few high grade movies. A Jack Nicholson flick
here, an Francis Ford Coppola movie there. All in all, she's edited
quite a few very well known movies. Her director credits, on the
other hand, are a completely different ball game. This movie, a
couple of erotic vampire flicks starring Alyssa Milano and some Red
Shoe Diaries episodes. I only ever saw one episode of Red Shoe
Diaries, so I wonder if… yup. I saw one with David Duchovny (he was
in 14 of them) and incidentally that's one
of the ones
she made. What an almost amusing coincidence. She seems to be
jonesing for that type of mild eroticism that's supposed to be an
alternative to more conventional and more hardcore pornography, so
all the people who overtly scoff at porn, can also live out their
suppressed sexual fantasies through moving images on their screens.
It's all hogwash, if you ask me.
Summing
this movie up really isn't
easy.... It's pretty shit. Oh would you look at that, seems like I
managed to sum it up nicely anyway.
I'll expand a little and say, that it just felt dragged out. What
could've been overcome in the duration of one Red Shoe Diary episode,
was fledged out into 105 sensual minutes that did
not come
off as hot or sensual in any way whatsoever.
They came off as forced, dull and devoid of any soul and passion. Not
that I really expected something super profound and
enticing, but still, when the movie you are
making a sequel for isn't even that good, you don't have to aim that
high. Still it failed miserably, and another nail was hammered into
Rourke's career's coffin. I'm glad he managed to hack his way out of
that coffin, because he's cool now. But I don't know if I'm ready to
excuse all the shitty flicks he had us watching throughout the 80s
and 90s. It just wasn't called for, is what
I'm trying to say here, I guess.
This image gets an honorable mention, because it's just completely loco. John looks out of his hotel room, and this horse falls over and is euthanized right there on the street. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment